Judgment of the Svea Court of Appeal, 27 October 2014, Case No. T 4525-13
Summary: the party sought to set aside the award alleging, among other grounds, that by disregarding evidence presented by the party when interpreting the contract, the tribunal had exceeded its mandate and incurred in a procedural error, which likely affected the outcome of the case. The Court noted that it was undisputed that the evidence had been presented to the arbitral tribunal; yet the fact that a tribunal in its review and evaluation of the evidence does not attach relevance to it, or even disregards it, forms part of the decisions on the merits and can thus not constitute excess of mandate or procedural error.