Order by the Stockholm District Court, 11 October 2010, Case No. T 15420-10
Summary: The claimant requested the court to order the seizure of property owned by the respondent to secure the enforcement of an arbitral award. The Stockholm District Court concluded that the claimant had a right to such an order, noting that delay in payment was detrimental to the claimant and that security had been provided for any damage that the respondent might incur.